Welcome from Jim Adams and Graham Ennis on


    Allah allows you to think

    A. Having reflected, I have recently looked at a priority system to condition the behaviour between the people I meet. 1 has higher priority than 2, which has higher priority
    than 3.
    1. The truth is the most important.
    2. The ethics of social relations is the second.
    3. My littleness, that is, my accommodation with others, is the third.
    This is a teaching, so I am presenting my will to you. I do not claim it represents the truth. My observation is that it seems to work. I change my ideas often. At the moment
    I am pleased that it seems to spread happiness to those around me. Before I sought to assert my power. Now, almost always, I seek to minimise it. I invite you, if you wish, to
    experiment to see if it works for you.

    B. I frequently change my mind. This has happened here, and the files have been restored. The text which follows comprises my original argument. I had thought a task I might
    wish to perform would be to go to Hiroshima and Nakasaki and listen in tranquility and peace to the words of the generals who did this. The text itself contans a prequel. I
    occasionally write in a bombastic style which I later amend or reduce. There is no urgent need to do this for the prequel.

    Having written a work Prayer to Humanity as the first item in this section, I had cause to reflect. It is a depiction of the great evils which I see inherent in our history, and is
    in the form of a service with formulistic rituals and movements of observance, expressed in an evocative and poetic language. It expesses no more than that, neither in support
    nor in condemnation. I had thought it would be interpreted as a condemnation of the actions of our race, to be taken independently of all urging, and on reflection that it seems
    a true picture of ourselves, and the attitudes that have produced these horrible events.

    This work is withdrawn.

    I had become concerned that there is a religious group in our society which has been marginalised and persecuted. It is my intention to marginalise and persecute nobody, and
    allow always religious expression.

    Paganism, involving the worship as I understand of the devil, has long historical roots in our society. I am unfamiliar with its texts and I am unable to comment on them. I
    would have thought, inexpert as I am, that an opinion within paganism is that evil is a ruling principle in our world. I would expect that a strand of this belief is that we
    accommodate to it.

    Aware also that religions have many denominations, it might well be the case that an additional idea would be to promote evil.

    The latter idea I cannot accept.

    I then came to the conclusion that for the Prayer to Humanity, expressing as it did parts of the human psyche with which I am in revolt, and vivid depictions in history of its
    effects, that I was in fact presenting a service to a Satanic Church, and this might well be accepted as a complete description of the intentions of this strand of paganism, and
    in its poetic description of evil it might well be attractive to them.

    I cannot allow this to happen, because although I allow the description of evil and people who commit it, I state my intention and action is the opposite. My attitude to those
    who wish to do evil is to state that my wish is the reverse. My attitude to those who wish to do evil is that I cannot harm others including those who wish to do evil even to me.
    It is incompatible with this viewpoint that my work should be used as a medium to assist the idea that activity which is evil is one to promote. The work must be withdrawn.

    O Lucifer, read your books!

    Prayer to Humanity

    A realisation opens.

    When I find myself, and everything that is within me, and there is no boundary to myself between what I am and what I am not, then will my soul and my love extend to the
    universe and be at oneness with myself.

    Rejecting nothing, neither Satan nor all his works which is within me, and the horror of what I am, and these worlds of beauty in which I am a part all this will become apparent
    to me.

    The evolution of Yin Yang doesn't find truth

    The family of Jesus

    Jesus before 30

    The escape from Judea

    Christianity before Constantine

    Gnostic texts

    Advanced insight and the love methodolgy of Jesus Christ

    The theoretical physics of Judas Iscariot

    Jesus's love solution: forgive the murderers and merge them with the love system

    We have now reached the limit of which any normal human might think we could consider. We have located parts of it within what we currently understand. There is an
    explanation which some my intuitively grasp is beyond what we have met before, but a reasonable account has been given of ways that our thinking has approched these
    issues and has come to an understanding of what they are about.

    As we move further on this discusion, already not a usual one, moves out into issues we cannot explain, looks at abstract theories which we consider on reflection could be
    raised but would be way beyond anything thought of before, or physical events which although we might consider even reasonably as possible or even likely, but we would
    wish to firmly reject as ever having occurred in practice if we were thought of as sensible in normal conversations, and finally reaches considerations of a matter which we
    understand on looking it up exists but no human would ever consider it.

    No technology could ever cope with it. It appears that the physics discussed as a solution violates some of our understandings in the current view of our civilisation as to what
    is possible in physics. What is amazing is we are getting hold of a concrete grasp of what is needed in its scale and extent and engaging in a technical discussion of physics part
    of which can be located on this website as physics of a new type derived from mathematics of a new type. We are discussing how this new physics can be employed and then
    how extensions of it could be developed in mathematical ways that are also documented and could be related to even newer physics but for which no documentation is available
    anywhere and we are broadcasting a message which we know we can read ourselves for it to be picked up and considered by aliens for them to come back and give us an answer
    so that we can look at it further. No normal human would do that. How did you get there and can I join in?

    To answer my own question, there is a piece in the section Evolutionary and Postevolutionary Systems called My Plan which documents in sometimes simultaneously amusing
    and observant ways the development of my life. Futher materal exists but has not yet been typed up. It will still be incomplete.

    On other issues I have decided to outline a programme of further research in mathematics. It is called Problems and developments in xiqu theory. I have decided on the title
    right now. As for the physics, the novanionic theory begun in the Physics section needs a new extension to embed it in something wider. The mathematics in the work on xiqus
    discusses zero algebras in the context of multiobjects. The mathematics work Number, space and logic had previously discussed zargonions. Beyond the currently known
    examples these were either new developments or violated what was currently understood. The basic question here is whether the multiobject theory developed in the work on
    xiqus can be applied, say in its zero algebra version, to the zargonion theory and even whether this newer discussion can be applied to generate an extension of the novanionic
    theory to generate new ideas of physics. We have stated, and were about to develop, the novanionic physics, but became aware if it were correct that it had social consequences.

    This may all be too much for the reader. But we indicate that an exact question and an exact programme of research is being located here. Even if I were to be run over by a bus
    tomorrow, I believe I have provided sufficient material and documentation for this programme of research so it could with the great determination of those who would wish to
    involve themselves in it and develop it further reach out the limits of human understanding to new horizons.

    Even if it were all wrong, it is not, what is wrong can be corrected. It is the duty of thse who research into mathematics and physics to consider it deeply in all its aspects,
    develop plans by which it may be extended, and that we are all human, our research programme is known and the objective of research is to ascend out of what we currently
    know which is sometimes, perhaps we might say often, misguided, correct ourselves and reach a new level of understanding which by successive applications will reach the
    truth. I have at least indicated that I have thought about some issues here, theoretical or physical, which have hitherto been thought of as untouchable. I invite you if you wish
    to involve yourelf in this research to do it with vigour. My reasoning is not untouchable. The purpose of research is not to locate individuals but to locate the truth. Go to it!

    Judas's objection: The Jesus solution is cognitive and not physical

    Why the Gnostics were wiped out

    How can a physical Kampf barrier be constructed?

    Other problems: can forgiveness be physically monitored?

    Security problems:
    1. We believe the input-output complexity is invertible, otherwise only dependent on the complexity of
    the algorithm.
    2. How can the Kampf wall be protected whilst transfer from an implicitly simple to direct complexity
    takes place?

    The Rigelian crash in Nevada

    An appeal to the Vatican to make its Library publicly available


    Why I am wrong, misguided and deluded

    Is it possible for an idea developed in a logical sequence (logical time) to be different from its appearance
    in physical time?

    The Andromeda-Milky Way collision - is it possible to get help beyond the event horizon?

    The novanionic theory allows instantaneous logicality. Galactic collision could be solved logically,
    back-transmitted and implemented.

    Extra event horizon energy is infinite, so the energy to avoid collision is available.

    Do antigravity layers make sense?

    What is the multiobject extension of the novanionic theory? Is it relevant?

    Multicolour games are not in general binary decomposable

    Is the physics multicolour or binary decomposable?

    What other options are there? What is your physics?

    If the physics is binary decomposable, can a multicolour universe be created?

    Is the universe multicolour and we don't know?

    What is your don't know theory? We have Rumsfeld's theorem, but it is binary generated and not multicoloured.

    You have an infinte don't know theory. This is wonderful! If the infinities are collected together, is the result a
    binary finite/infinite, or is it multicoloured?

    I think I have just crashed Rigelian don't know theory. Perhaps they don't have politics.

    What are the Andromeda Galactic communication protocols? Is the apparatus situated at Rigel?

    Since your transmission is instantaneous is it novanionic? What is the structure of the quantum implementation?

    Do you work in logical time or is all time communication physical?